Total Arch Replacement in a Patient with Type A Acute Aortic Dissection and Situs Inversus Totalis / 日本心臓血管外科学会雑誌

<p>We report a case of type A acute aortic dissection in a patient with situs inversus totalis. A 51-year-old man was hospitalized with sudden-onset back pain. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed Stanford type A acute aortic dissection and situs inversus totalis. Total arch replacement using selective cerebral perfusion and mild hypothermic circulatory arrest was successfully performed. He was discharged home 23 days after the operation.</p>

A Case of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection with Acute Coronary Syndrome : Left Main Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery / 日本心臓血管外科学会雑誌

<p>A 45-year-old man was hospitalized with sudden-onset chest pain. He was in cardiogenic shock with a systolic pressure of 68 mmHg. His electrocardiogram (ECG) showed ST segment elevation in leads I, aVL, and V2-5. An emergency coronary angiogram (CAG) showed that the true lumens of bilateral coronary arteries were compressed, showing acute Stanford type A aortic dissection involving bilateral coronary artery. A bare metal stent was promptly implanted in the left main trunk (LMT) to restore coronary blood flow because of his hemodynamic instability. Soon afterwards, the ischemic changes on ECG disappeared and he was transferred to the operating room in a stable hemodynamic condition. We performed emergency graft replacement of the ascending aorta and coronary artery bypass grafting. The postoperative CAG showed patent bypass grafts. Implantation of LMT stent, as a bridge to surgery, should be the treatment of choice for acute type A dissection involving LMT.</p>

Surgical Embolectomy for Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism / 日本心臓血管外科学会雑誌

Treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism (APTE) in patients with hemodynamic instability still remains controversial. We analyzed the outcome and validity of surgical pulmonary embolectomy for APTE. Between January of 2004 to December of 2010, 15 patients underwent emergency surgical pulmonary embolectomy using cardiopulmonary bypass with beating heart. Our operative indications were ; within 7 days from onset, hemodynamic instability, bilateral pulmonary artery obstruction or unilateral obstruction with central clot and right ventricular dysfunction. Ten patients presented in cardiogenic shock, two of whom showed cardiac arrest and required cardiopulmonary resuscitation before operation. One patient required percutaneous cardiopulmonary support. Median follow up period is 33 months (range 3 to 86 months). All patients survived the operation, but 3 patients died in the hospital on post operative day 11 (massive cerebral infarction), day 18 (brain hypoxia) and day 25 (multiorgan failure). Two of them had cardiac arrest and received cardiopulmonary resuscitation before operation. Hospital mortality was 20%. And all patients left the hospital on foot except one patient who had been bedridden by myotonic dystrophy before operation. No patients died or showed symptoms of pulmonary hypertension after discharge. Prompt diagnosis and surgical pulmonary embolectomy before threatening fatal condition improves the outcome of embolectomy.